WESTERN ROUNDUP-
DEC
22 , 2003
National preserve is in hot water
by April Reese
Some say proposal to build a geothermal
power plant in the Valles Caldera is a ploy to extort money from
the Forest Service
Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico — Along the
road that skirts the Valles Caldera in northern New Mexico, there’s
a sign explaining that the valley beyond — the Valle Grande
— was created by an eruption “500 times greater than
the May 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens.” But the last
line is almost unreadable, crossed out by a vandal’s swipe
of yellow spray paint: “The young volcanic dome’s heat
makes the area attractive for geothermal energy development.”
In 2000, when Congress coughed up $100 million to buy the area —
an 89,000-acre geologic funhouse whose main attraction is the collapsed
volcanic dome, or caldera — everyone from the U.S. Forest
Service to environmental groups to Sen. Pete Dominici, R-N.M., breathed
a collective sigh of relief that the unique property would be protected
from future development.
But some of the rights to the resources beneath the valley were
left in private hands. Congress directed the Forest Service to purchase
the remaining mineral rights, but after several years of negotiations,
the agency gave up on the effort. Now, the owner has leased those
rights to GeoProducts, a Texas-based geothermal energy company,
and the three-year-old national preserve may soon be home to a power
plant, geothermal wells and power lines.
GeoProducts wants to convert the caldera’s 600-degree underground
steam into electricity and sell that electricity to Los Alamos National
Laboratory. The nuclear weapons facility is looking for new sources
of electricity, and the Department of Energy finds the nearby geothermal
plant an attractive and “clean” option.
“With geothermal (development), the market is almost just
as important as the resource, because you need to build a plant
as well as drill the wells,” says GeoProducts President Ken
Boren. “If we were able to tie into DOE’s needs, it
would give us that market.”
A tangled web
The Harrell family of Abiline, Texas, owns the outstanding 12.5
percent of the preserve’s mineral rights, and has tried negotiating
with the Forest Service. But according to Don Harrell, the agency
rejected the family’s initial offer of about $13 million —
offering $1.8 million instead.
Harrell, whose family has owned the rights since the 1970s, says
he’s still willing to negotiate. While GeoProducts now controls
the rights, Boren says that he and Harrell have agreed to kill the
project if the Forest Service makes an offer of about $15 million.
Meanwhile, Harrell doesn’t hesitate to tell a reporter what’s
at stake.
“Domenici has told the people of New Mexico that they’ve
protected this wonderful piece of property,” says Harrell.
“But they haven’t. It’s no more protected than
it was the day they bought it.”
Some environmental groups and federal officials suspect the power
plant proposal is a ruse aimed at goosing the Forest Service into
plumping up its offer. But Boren is moving ahead: GeoProducts has
already submitted a proposal to the Western Area Power Administration,
a division of the U.S. Department of Energy, and has applied for
state permits to reopen some geothermal wells drilled by a previous
leaseholder.
“This is arguably the best geo-thermal in the United States
that’s undeveloped,” says Boren. “There’s
nothing else like it.”
Full steam ahead
GeoProducts plans to reopen about a dozen wells that were drilled
by UNOCAL in the 1970s, and pipe the steam to a pair of on-site
power plants. The steam-powered turbines would put out a total of
12 to 20 megawatts, which would be carried to a power station in
Los Alamos by power lines through the Santa Fe National Forest.
Power demand at the lab is “pretty stable,” says Los
Alamos spokesman Jim Danneskiold. He explains that the lab is only
interested in electricity from the Valles Caldera plant as a way
to comply with a federal directive for federal facilities to increase
their use of renewable energy. But the lab is also in the running
for the “modern pit facility” that would manufacture
plutonium triggers for nuclear weapons, and such new projects could
boost the lab’s power demand (HCN, 8/1/03: Courting the Bomb).
Gary Ziehe, executive director of the Valles Caldera Trust, which
manages the preserve, says that unlike logging and ranching, energy
development was not part of the federal government’s vision
for the property. But ultimately, the trust’s hands may be
tied. It’s up to the Forest Service and the Harrells to work
out a deal, and they remain in a stalemate. The American Land Conservancy,
a California-based land trust, has an option with the Harrells and
GeoProducts to buy their rights and then convey them to the federal
government. But so far, the Forest Service has been silent on the
group’s offer.
And time is running out to stop the power plant: New tax incentives
aimed at spurring renewable energy development, combined with higher
electricity prices and interest from Los Alamos, are making the
project increasingly attractive, Boren and Harrell say. At the same
time, the preserve is looking for ways to meet its federal mandate
to pay for its own management.
“We have come to the end of the yellow brick road,”
Harrell says. “And there’s no pot of gold there.”
The author writes from Santa Fe, New Mexico.
This story was made possible by a grant from the McCune Charitable
Foundation.