WESTERN ROUNDUP-
Jan.
19 , 2004
Amoment
of truth for user fees
by Puanani Mench
Critics say fees take the ‘public’
out of the public lands
The Recreation Fee Demonstration Program, or "fee demo,"
has raised a ruckus in the West since its 1996 debut, when the public
started "paying to play" on federal lands. Recreation
fees — charged for access to hiking trails, visitor centers
and other spots — have been authorized for 400 sites managed
by the Forest Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management
and Fish and Wildlife Service.
The program is the brainchild of Ohio Congressman Ralph Regula,
R, who thought fees would help fix a multibillion-dollar maintenance
backlog on public lands. It has met emphatic opposition from a wide
range of public-lands users, who argue that fees represent double
taxation, turn land managers into profiteers, and allow private
industry to make money from public lands. Nonetheless, fee demo
has survived for eight years, extended every few years through "riders,"
language attached to unrelated bills in Congress. A rider passed
in September extended the program until January 2006.
Now, Regula is pushing a bill that would make fee demo permanent,
and extend fees to virtually all federal lands, including recreation
areas operated by the Bureau of Reclamation. Visitors would have
to purchase an "America the Beautiful Pass," costing between
$85 and $100, that would cover "basic fees" for parking,
visitor centers, restrooms and picnic tables. Amenities like camp
sites and boat launches, as well as commercial tours and group events,
would be extra. The bill would also increase penalties for people
who refuse to pay — from the current $100 fine, to up to $5,000
and 6 months in jail.
But Regula’s bill flies in the face of mounting criticism
of the program, including a bleak report from the investigative
arm of Congress. "(The bill is) so far over the top on what
is reasonable that it’s almost ludicrous," says Robert
Funkhouser, president of the Western Slope No-Fee Coalition, a grassroots
group based in western Colorado.
Privatizing the public lands
For some fee foes, Regula’s bill is most disturbing because
it would turn the fee program over to "non-governmental entities,"
such as nonprofit groups and private contractors.
Already, critics say there is enormous pressure on land managers
to bring in fee money, because Congress has starved them of funding.
They say the fee program has turned public-land stewards into salesmen
and developers. Bring in private industry to administer the program,
they say, and you’ll see industry pushing an even stronger,
profit-driven agenda, rather than looking out for the public’s
best interest or the health of the land.
But Interior Department officials have voiced strong support for
the provisions in Regula’s bill, and privatizing fee management
fits in nicely with the Bush administration’s push to contract
out agency jobs. Several agencies, including the Forest Service,
the Park Service and the BLM, have already partnered with Reserve
USA, a subsidiary of Ticketmaster, to offer online campground reservations.
Gail van der Bie, recreation manager for the Forest Service in Washington,
D.C., says the company tags a $9 fee onto advance reservations for
33,000 Forest Service campsites nationwide.
But critics contend that privatization is a slippery slope. Soon,
they say, rustic campgrounds will be turned into upscale RV parks.
"We’re going to see recreation become an extractive industry,"
says Jon Orlando of the Arizona NoFee Coalition. "That’s
the threat."
Already, there are signs of this starting. A young Boise firm, NomadISP,
has begun offering high-speed Internet access to campgrounds via
satellites. CEO Kelly Hogan says Internet access is becoming highly
desirable for laptop-toting recreationists. The service has been
tested in 25 Forest Service campgrounds in the Northwest, and Hogan
says orders are starting to come in. "In the next two years,
if campsites and campgrounds don’t install it, they’ll
lose business," he says.
Are the agencies ready for a pony?
The fee demo debate heated up last spring, when the General Accounting
Office released a damning report on the Forest Service’s management
of the fee program. Longtime fee champion Rep. Scott McInnis, R-Colo.,
ordered the report in response to criticism that agencies were squandering
fee money on projects like the Amphitheater Campground near Ouray,
Colo., which was renovated at a cost of $19,354 per campsite.
Of the $35 million in gross revenue the Forest Service reports from
fee demo in 2001, the report finds that 43 percent went back into
collecting fees and administering the program. And the Forest Service
has no system for determining whether or not fee demo has helped
solve the maintenance backlog. "The Forest Service has made
little real progress in resolving its long-standing performance
accountability problems and remains years away from implementing
a credible performance accountability system," the report says.
"The GAO report crystallizes the inadequacies of this program,"
says Josh Penry, who was the staff director for the House Forests
Subcommittee when the report was issued. "If there’s
minimal value added on the ground, why go through the brain damage
and continue to pursue a policy that creates dissent?"
Ironically, McInnis, who chaired the Forests Subcommittee, has reserved
his criticism for the Forest Service. He supported the recent rider
that extended the program for another two years, and insists that
the program can be "fixed." Some believe that the GAO
report may become just another argument that private industry can
do a better job than public agencies.
But the Forest Service’s van der Bie says change is on the
way. Her agency is collaborating with the Interior Department to
streamline fees and make them more consistent. The Forest Service
promises renewed vigilance in managing fee money, and says administering
the fee program should cost no more than 25 percent of the money
fees bring in.
Even with such reforms, critics oppose the push to make the fee
program permanent. "If your kid can’t keep a goldfish
alive," says Kitty Benzar of the Western Slope No-Fee Coalition,
"you don’t buy them a pony."
Congress will likely pass a bill deciding the fate of fee demo this
year.
The author is a former HCN intern.
Robert Funkhouser with the Western Slope No-Fee Coalition, 802-867-2298
Gail van der Bie with the Forest Service, 202-205-1756