WESTERN ROUNDUP-
June
7, 2004
Small-time ski operator fights for his life by Alex Pasquariello
A mom-and-pop ski area takes on a Texas
billionaire and his plans for a mega-development
WOLF CREEK PASS, Colorado — Davey Pitcher, the president
of Wolf Creek Ski Area, sighs and looks out his office window. Though
it’s closed for the season, his ski area, located at 10,500
feet in the San Juan Mountains, is still covered in six feet of
powder. But it is the other white stuff that weighs heavily on Pitcher’s
mind these days; his desk is buried in an avalanche of official-looking
paperwork.
Pitcher is preparing to go toe-to-toe with Texas billionaire Billy
Joe "Red" McCombs, co-founder of the media behemoth, Clear
Channel Communications Inc. McCombs and his venture partner, Bob
Honts, an Austin, Texas-based real estate developer, want to build
the state’s biggest ski resort village on a 288-acre enclave
in the middle of Wolf Creek Ski Area. "The Village at Wolf
Creek" would include 1,200 rooms in three hotels, 129 lots
for single-family homes, 1,661 multi-family units, 4,525 covered
parking spaces, 222,000 square feet of commercial space —
and a population of 10,000, year-round.
For most ski areas, developments like this are welcome; the industry
has been flat for several years, so the real money is to be had
in real estate (HCN, 12/7/98: Vail and the road to a recreational
empire) . But Pitcher says the village, planned for a meadow called
Alberta Park that links the South San Juan and Weminuche wilderness
areas, is in the best interests of neither the ski area nor the
environment.
"Skier-driven, backcountry-oriented ski areas like Wolf Creek
are an endangered species in this state," he says. "We
refuse to take a ‘build it and they will come’ view
of skiing."
NEPA to the rescue?
The current fracas is just the latest chapter in an 18-year saga.
McCombs acquired Alberta Park in a land trade with the Forest Service
in 1986. The trade was originally denied by officials with the Rio
Grande National Forest, who argued that it wasn’t in the public’s
best interest to trade away land surrounded by national forest.
But two weeks later, bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., ordered him
to change his decision.
"We’re still mystified as to how the decision was changed,"
says Pitcher, who initially supported the land swap. "There’s
no paper trail and the Forest Service isn’t talking."
McCombs sat on the land for years, but in 1998, he brought Honts
on board. Since then, The Village at Wolf Creek has ballooned from
a small resort to a city on a mountain.
Thanks to local environmentalists, however, the Forest Service may
still have the power to stop the development, or at least limit
its scale.
In 1999, the group Colorado Wild appealed a Forest Service decision
allowing Wolf Creek to build a new chair lift. The lift, which would
carry skiers from the development to the slopes, was the linchpin
of McComb’s development scheme. The group settled its appeal
in exchange for a 250-foot buffer between the lift’s access
road and the private land. That would require the Forest Service
to complete an environmental analysis under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) before the developers could get access for construction.
McCombs and Honts have fought to gain that access without triggering
NEPA — even allegedly trying to strong-arm Pitcher into illegally
constructing a road and utility corridor. When Pitcher wouldn’t
budge, the developers asked a Texas congressman to attach a rider
to the 2002 Farm Bill that would have given them access to the corridor
and authorized construction of a five-mile-long natural gas line
through wilderness in the San Juan and Rio Grande forests. That
attempt was foiled by The Wilderness Society in Washington, D.C.
In November 2003, McCombs and Honts finally submitted an application
requesting road and utility easements across the 250 feet of public
land. The Forest Service hopes to issue a draft environmental impact
statement in late summer.
Honts says that the agency can’t deny access to the property
and threatens to sue if the development is blocked. He hasn’t
taken kindly to Pitcher’s recent opposition, and says he has
contracts Pitcher signed in 2000 promising his support. "I
don’t know why Davey changed his mind about our project, but
I know he doesn’t have the right to do it," he says.
"This resort will be built with or without his support."
The Forest Service held three public scoping meetings that were
so packed that a fourth had to be added. "The ski area seems
to have a lot of allies," says Steve Brigham, NEPA coordinator
with the Rio Grande Forest. "It’s a real battle, though,
and the Forest Service is stuck right in the middle."