With careful management, grazing can help restore the Western range
By Allan Savory
for Headwaters News
With careful management, grazing can help restore the Western range
By Allan Savory
for Headwaters News
"Plant species not seen in decades have returned, springs have reappeared and wildlife has grown more plentiful and diverse."
Why is so much land deteriorating?
For simplicitys sake, we can say there are three broad types of plant
in the Rocky Mountain West: evergreen and deciduous woody plants (trees, shrubs,
weeds), and grasses.
Of these, other than in higher rainfall environments where a full canopy of
trees can grow, soil cover is derived primarily from living grass plants and
their dead litter. All plants and plant parts follow a simple life cycle of
birth, growth, death and decay.
Biological decay depends upon billions of microorganisms. If something should
block decay, plant parts oxidize and turn gray, leading to the death of most
perennial grass species and high fire risks.
Evergreen trees have leaves that remain green throughout the year. Deciduous
trees have green leaves that grow profusely in spring and summer. In fall these
trees withdraw food from their leaves, which change color, and are then cut
off and shed.
If the tree could not shed its own leaves, the dead leaves would not decay (too
few microorganisms above soil surface level) but would oxidize and smother the
trees buds the following spring.
All perennial grasses grow green stems and leaves in the growing season. In
the Rocky Mountain West where moisture is low and there is a long dormant season,
the grasses move nutrients out of their leaves and into their roots and bases
well before winter. Their dead leaves and stems turn yellow. But where deciduous
trees can shed leaves, no grass in the world developed this ability.
The role of animals in the plant life cycle
Grasses do not have any mechanism to shed their own stems and leaves simply
because they co-evolved with millions of grazing animals.
These animals removed dead leaf and stem, ensuring that the growth points, or
buds, were exposed to sunlight in the spring. That is why most perennial grasses
have their growth points at ground level, below grazing height. The grasses
were as dependent on the grazers as the grazers were on them.
The animals, unable to digest grass, had a long-established partnership with
microorganisms in their gut, which enabled them to break down a mass of forage
into smaller bulk (dung and urine), which could more easily decay.
What the animals did not graze they generally trampled to the ground as litter,
where it would eventually decay. Without the grazing animals to perform this
vital function, the decay part of the perennial grasss life cycle is disrupted.
The dead leaves can take decades to break down, by oxidizing and weathering,
exposing the plant to an early death by the choking gray leaves.
So fire the most severe form of oxidation is often used to clear
the highly flammable material away. When the plant dies, or is kept alive by
fire, soil is exposed.
Obviously some perennial grasses developed in sites seldom if ever reached by
large grazing animals, and they can survive years without leaf removal.
They do this by forming branches like a tree with growth points high up on the
plant (tobosa), or developing a very sparse structure (gramma or Aristida).
These are the types of grasses that now dominate the Rocky Mountain West.
The decline of the grasslands
Over billions of years, despite periodic (in geological terms) major disruptions,
the soils and biological communities in the Rocky Mountain West functioned with
this mutual dependence.
Then suddenly there appeared on the North American landscape some 10,000 to
15,000 years ago, a new creature, the first human predator.
Humans
are naturally an omnivorous scavenger and not a predator, as you quickly realize
if you try to kill a deer with your hands and teeth. But in a geologically short
time span, we developed into a totally new form of predator using language (organization),
fire and spear.
Previous predators hunted in packs in open grasslands, and their prey protected
themselves by bunching into vast herds and dropping their young over short birthing
periods.
Predator packs are intimidated by the herd and have to isolate animals to kill
them, whereupon many predators feed on one animal. The new human predator did
not fear herds and found it easier to kill whole herds (driven over cliffs,
into boggy ground or surrounded with fire) than to isolate an animal.
Where many pack hunters had fed on one animal, many humans fed on only a few
of the animals killed. This new wasteful form of predation, to which most animals
could not adapt quickly enough, combined with the fact that humans are omnivorous
and can turn to many food sources, proved devastating.
In the few thousand years following the arrival of these skilled, human hunters,
most of North Americas megafauna disappeared due to both hunting and fire-induced
changes to the landscape.
European pioneers who described vast herds of bison, deer and antelope were
seeing only a remnant of North Americas former glory. Early explorers,
like Lewis and Clark, give clues in their journals of the deterioration that
was taking place.
Resting grasslands is not natural
Though I have obviously oversimplified many of my points, I hope you can begin
to see how they relate to the situation today. This knowledge was lacking 60
years ago, when U.S. government agencies established a number of research plots
in the Rocky Mountain West to prove that grasslands would recover
if rested from livestock and other large grazing animals.
Initially such plots respond favorably to no grazing, but as oxidation replaces
decay the land deteriorates, as you can see when inspecting the plots today.
Those I have inspected and photographed all show serious degradation and little
difference between the inside (totally protected) and the outside (animals graze
in low numbers).
Frequently, research by others has reported little difference between grazed
and ungrazed land, which supports what the research plots demonstrate.
Many thousands of years ago, when the soils and biological communities in the
Rocky Mountain West developed, grasslands were primarily maintained by large
grazing animals and very infrequent fire.
Today the large herds have been replaced by fewer, widely scattered, animals,
and fire is far more frequent a trend that began with the arrival of
those first human hunters to the Americas.
While a few animals lingering in favored areas, such as riparian zones, is devastating
to our river systems, so too is too few animals on the catchment area (or watershed)
that feeds those rivers.
We can begin to put this right by mimicking what occurred naturally in the Rocky
Mountain West prior to the arrival of humans vast herds moving over equally
vast areas constantly maintaining biological decay and thus healthy grasslands.
Using livestock as a management tool
When I first realized we could use livestock as land reclamation tools some
40 years ago, I began working with ranchers in a number of countries to learn
how to do that effectively.
With their input and many years of trial-and-error effort, we developed a planning
process that proved successful and has only become more so as we continue to
learn.
Plant species not seen in decades have returned, springs have reappeared and
wildlife has grown more plentiful and diverse. Any number of ranchers in the
Rocky Mountain West who are using this planning process and managing in this
more holistic manner, have received good stewardship awards for their land management.
The U.S. Forest Service is currently collaborating with the Savory Center to
see if we can establish a national learning site in Idaho where we can encourage
environmental organizations, as well as livestock operators, to work together
to reverse the land degradation that is of such concern to all of us.
As we have learned on private lands, these public lands can also be managed
using livestock as a tool to promote their recovery at low cost.
There is no reason why the grasslands of Idaho, or elsewhere in the Rocky Mountain
West cannot once again sustain abundant wildlife and healthy rural communities.
Allan Savory, with his wife Jody Butterfield, founded the Center for Holistic Management in Albuquerque. In 1999, the center's board and staff voted to change the name of the institute to the Allan Savory Center for Holistic Management.
Have an opinion? Post it now.
Click here
to comment. Click
here to see what others are saying.
Or click here to
view other forums.
to
perspective| to
page 1
send
this page to a friend