send this page
government
about us
newsrack
 
perspective
forums
subscribe
support
page 1
rockies
opinion
beyond
in-depth
page 2
community
environment
politics
economy
more
workrooms
contact us

Past Perspectives:

Jan. 23:
Economist Tom Power and the West's Post-Cowboy Economy

Jan. 30:
Forest Service learned little from 30 years of controversy on Montana forest.

Feb. 6
Idaho's newest judge illustrates the rising influence of Hispanics.

Feb. 13
Utah's newest monument proposal could be a chance to mend political fences.

Feb. 20
Collaboration and consensus emerge as new ways to manage public lands.

Feb. 27
Montana's Rock Creek Mine would undercut wilderness.

March 6
The rural West's economic development depends on the value of its amenities.

March 13
The guru of intensive grazing says Western ranges will recover better with cattle grazing.

March 20
Rural Western economies haven't faded with the timber industry, they've grown on the strength of forest amenities.

March 27
Stewardship contracts give National Forest rangers the latitude to fix the forest.

April 3
Grand Canyon's seeps and springs are fed by irreplaceable ground water.

April 10
B.C. Liberals' 'New Era' could be beginning of the end for some ecosystems



 


     
| |
 
This week: April 17, 2002
Peace parks
 
Waterton-Glacier is an icon for economic fairness and environmental stability

Shared ideals, common resources offer trans-border geography of hope

By Steve Thompson
for Headwaters News


North Americans tend to take for granted the world’s longest unprotected border, which separates Canada and the United States. So the current war of words between leaders of these two nations may come as a surprise to some.

The United States is a "hostile foreign power," thundered a member of the conservative British Columbia cabinet, and Canada should stop supporting the U.S. war against terrorism. Not to be outdone, Montana Sen. Max Baucus evoked Cold War images to blast B.C.’s "Soviet-style" tendencies.

The object of mutual belligerence last month was the Bush administration’s decision to slap a 29 percent tariff on Canadian softwood lumber exports to the United States. It is the most recent flashpoint that reveals the soft underbelly of an increasingly integrated global economy.

Against this charged political backdrop, our two nations are preparing to celebrate in June the 70th anniversary of the world’s first international peace park. Approved by the U.S. Congress and Canadian Parliament, Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park was dedicated on June 18, 1932, by President Hoover and Prime Minister Bennett as a lasting monument to peace and goodwill between the two nations.


"In a world beset by conflict and division, peace is one of the cornerstones of the future. Peace parks are a building block in this process, not only in our region, but potentially in the entire world."

-- Nelson Mandela


The peace park also addresses the need for cooperation and stewardship in a world of shared resources. In the case of Waterton-Glacier, the shared resources are grizzly bears, mountain goats, clean water, stunning vistas and more than 2 million annual visitors, all of which flow back and forth across political lines.

Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park was the brainchild of Rotary International, led by a cluster of Rotary Clubs in Montana and Alberta.

At the time, Rotary International was focused on establishing institutions of peace to help prevent a repeat of the carnage of World War I. The 1932 Peace Park designation was seen as a means of cementing harmonious relations between old allies while providing a model for nations around the world.

The recent war of words between Canadian and U.S. leaders points to the evolving challenge of maintaining peace in a world where economic trade, instantaneous information exchange, free flows of capital, and multinational terrorist cells have blurred the traditional lines between nation-states.

Peace means much more than the absence of military combat. Today, the concept also must embrace notions of economic fairness, environmental sustainability, and some level of parity between the world’s rich and poor.


(more)

Have an opinion? Join the discussion in this week's forum.

Or click here to view all our forums.


click here for a printer-friendly version of this column


| |


Bigger Waterton also would benefit Montana's fish, wildlife, air and water

By Greg Lakes, editor
Headwaters News
April 17, 2002

In addition to its symbolism for a global consumer economy, as Steve Thompson eloquently argues above, the expansion of Waterton National Park would have some tangible environmental benefits on both sides of the border -- but at Canadians' expense, according to critics.

The plan, a proposal of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, would add 100,000 acres on the west side of Waterton to the North Fork of the Flathead River.

The newly incorporated area would protect habitat, water quality and fish populations in the North Fork, which flows south along the western edge of Glacier National Park in Montana and into Flathead Lake.

On the U.S. side, that would mean more secure habitat for the big carnivores that have been reintroduced amid so much controversy, as well as pristine habitat for cutthroat and bull trout in the Flathead's headwaters.

Without protection, U.S. interests in the Canadian Flathead are beyond its control, as was made clear in the early 1980s, when a company proposed a giant open-pit coal mine that opponents said would foul the air over Glacier, ruin the views and choke the streams.

That plan died but more insidious threats haven't. The Montana side of the North Fork is home to scattered cabins and one anachronistic settlement.

But the Canadian side is becoming more attractive as a haven for mountain retreats and second homes. Energy companies have punched roads into valleys and along ridges in nearby portions of B.C. and Alberta, and at least one coal company has explored west of the Flathead River.

The timber company with the largest stake has agreed to back an expansion of the park, in exchange for improvements at its mill a little farther west.

But critics of the plan, including the provincial outfitters' association, say national park status would eliminate hunting, fishing and most motorized off-road access.

Others worry that an international peace park designation would draw even more visitors, at the expense of backcountry values.

But advocates have bigger plans yet. The expansion would be part of a Southern Rocky Mountain Wildlife Management Area that they hope would cover 700,000 acres across Canada's Wigwam, Elk and Bull river valleys.


Have an opinion? Join the discussion in this week's forum.

Or click here to view all our forums.


click here for a printer-friendly version of this column


| |

 
Related stories
B.C. producers push lumber to U.S. before tariff kicks in
National Post;
April 15

Too many national parks in disrepair, official says
Washington Post;
April 14

Jasper Park invites in wolves to scare off overly domesticated elk
National Post;
April 11

Agents kill two wolves in western Montana
Billings Gazette (AP);
April 11

Wolves branch out northeast of Yellowstone
Billings Gazette;
April 11

Expansion of B.C. park would protect land on both sides of border
Great Falls Tribune;
April 9

Montana officials would allow hunting of delisted grizzlies
Bozeman Chronicle;
April 9

Agents eliminate marauding Idaho wolf pack
Billings Gazette;
April 9

Administration to rewrite Northwest Forest Plan

Portland Oregonian;
April 9

Alberta premier weighs in against canned hunts on game farms
National Post;
April 9

Canadian national park workers vote to strike
National Post;
April 9

Softwood tariffs will cripple Alberta mills, industry says
Edmonton Journal;
April 08

Alberta timber industry anxious, angry about failed softwood talks
Edmonton Journal;
Mar. 27

Opinion

Wolf management should be local, not national
Billings Gazette;
April 12

B.C. ministers' assault on U.S. trade policies clashes with reality
Vancouver Sun;
Mar. 29


Headwaters News is a project of the Center for the Rocky Mountain West at the University of Montana.