Headwaters Perspective Headwaters News engages our readers in a different issue every other Wednesday.

We encourage you to send us your comments. Your email must contain your name.
   
 

Read past Perspectives

Read
NewVoices/
NewWest:
Reporting by the region's top journalism students


Read Courtney White's series: A West that Works

Read the Interior Secretaries series


Related stories:

     


Copper boom buoys Arizona towns
Arizona Republic; 04/28/2005

Idaho to get first coal-fired power plant
Twin Falls Times-News; 04/28/2005

Report: Wyoming industry may haze up park's air
Billings Gazette; 04/19/2005

Study shows air getting hazier in Colorado's national parks
Denver Rocky Mountain News; 04/18/2005

Wyoming coalbed methane raises water issues
Denver Business Journal; 04/20/2005

High metals prices reopens Montana mine
Missoulian; 03/31/2005

Wyoming has new air-quality rules on 'flaring'
Casper Star-Tribune; 03/23/2005

Wyoming flush with coalbed methane, wastewater
High Country News; 03/07/2005

Montana copper, silver mine gets another look
Missoulian; 02/01/2005

Coal burns bright for Montana, Wyoming economies
Billings Gazette; 01/16/2005


Backgrounders

Environmental Protection Agency Toxic Release Inventory Program

The Rise of the Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, and Everyday Life",Basic Books

Bowling Alone,
Simon & Schuster


Western Perspective is sponsored by:



Consensual success

Annual report on counties of the Rocky Mountain West finds collaborative effort, prosperity go hand-in-hand
By Patrick Holmes
for Headwaters News

"The West, through Hollywood, has an enormous influence on popular culture, but otherwise it generally lacks an intellectual, cultural, or social presence within either the country or the continent."
-Stanford's Bill Lane Center for the Study of the North American West

Art, culture, and identity together play an important role in building social cohesion, increasing community vibrancy, and enhancing the quality of life in communities in the Rocky Mountain West.

But beyond just mere added amenity values, art and identity are often indicative of a community's social capital – the bonds that enable collective action.

The Stanford perspective, albeit geographically challenged in asserting Hollywood as the epicenter of Western intellect, is in many ways sobering.


Because we have so far proven ourselves to be inadequate stewards of the region's vast public land holdings according to this argument, the rest of the country does not trust us with sovereignty.

Despite the ongoing debunking of the rugged self-reliant cowboy myth, our efforts here in the Interior West to both redefine our identity and to seek collective solutions that proactively govern our resources and communities are not yet mature.

Back here in the Rockies (in what must seem like the "middle West" from the Stanford perspective) many astute observers have noted our adolescent attitudes towards consensual politics.

The harsh truth, according to Ed Marston, former editor of High Country News, is that: "We live as Southerners did during Reconstruction, occupied by an often federal force, and for many of the same dismal reasons."

Because we have so far proven ourselves to be inadequate stewards of the region's vast public land holdings according to this argument, the rest of the country does not trust us with sovereignty. "And," added Marston, "they are right."

While it is our federal government dependency that best characterizes our lack of participatory management, the waning collective response of citizens in the Rockies towards other issues abounds as well.

Unparalleled industrial toxic pollution levels, potentially disastrous nuclear waste disposal plans, and oil and gas extraction policies that give no rights to private landowners or communities to mitigate negative impacts, are just a few examples of how national and multi-national interests trump local concerns regularly here.

Accusations that we serve as an "inland colony" and that we lack "sovereignty" are reflective of the delicacy with which we must strike a balance between our local citizenship towards our communities and the Rockies region, with our often-conflicting duty to our nation, and our world.

The 2005 Colorado College State of the Rockies Report Card, released at the annual Rockies conference held April 5-7, examines these and other issues through insightful essays on regional management and by grading communities in the Rockies on their civic capacity and engagement, their creative culture, toxic pollution levels, urban sprawl and energy issues.

Speakers at the 2005 Rockies Conference, from Terry Anderson of the Property and Environment Research Center, to author Terry Tempest Williams and her talk on the "Open Space of Democracy," all tended to agree: the new productive arena for citizens of the Rockies lies in charting a path towards prosperity that values community identity and a more responsible self-governance.

Community Identity for Economy and Culture of Place

From the landscapes of Georgia O'Keefe and Ansel Adams, to the characteristic black-on-black pottery of Maria Martinez and the musings of Leslie Marmon Silko, the arts of the Rocky Mountain West hardly lend credence to Stanford's assertion that the West "lacks" a cultural presence.

Born from our history and even more so our landscape, our art forms are uniquely diverse and authentic, but while they tend to reflect as at our best, expressing our local connection to place, they often, as the Stanford group asserts, depict us at our worst, instead perpetuating stereotypes of the American frontier.

An emerging rift between a romanticized western culture and an eclectic mountain culture in the Rockies has blossomed in the wake of the booming tourist industry. A homogenous, and often frivolous, western folk art designed for large audiences of transient-bobo-skiers blankets the Rocky Mountain West.

From the travels of Buffalo Bill's Wild West show to the contemporary shops of imposter-katchina dolls and peculiarly out of habitat paintings of saguaro cacti, the West has long wrestled with its pervasive art forms.

But there may be a new call to reform the unique identity of the arts and culture in the towns and mountain valleys of the Rockies. There may be, in fact, distinct economic advantages to places that harbor new forms of creativity and authenticity.

In his book, "The Rise of the Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, and Everyday Life," Richard Florida chronicles the emergence of a new socio-economic and demographic group that he claims has become the principal driver of economic productivity, affluence, and ingenuity in contemporary society.

Since publication of the best-selling book in 2002, attracting and retaining Florida's creative class, a diverse mix of everything from architects and software designers to musicians, artists, and management consultants, has taken center stage in economic development circles.

Florida's assertion that "place is the key economic and social organizing unit of our time" has fueled the now popular notion that economic competitive advantage is a product of a region's ability to attract and retain creative workers.

In a nutshell, Florida's theory of regional economic growth postulates that growth is driven by the location choices of creative people who prefer places that are diverse, tolerant, and open to new ideas. In turn, these places seem to be generating higher rates of innovation, business formation, and economic growth.

Here in the Rockies, Florida's creative class makes up about 27% of the workforce, yet these folks disproportionately generate more than half the region's earned income.

While creative occupations constitute more than 15 times the amount of employment in the Rockies region in traditional mainstays like agriculture, forestry, and resource extraction, today an overwhelming 49% of the Rocky Mountain region works in the service class, which by Florida's definition consists of low-skill, low-pay occupations like cleaning, maintenance, and food preparation.

Florida's hypothesis holds great potential for a region looking to generate new forms of economic activity. In fact, the "new" competitive advantage of communities in the Rockies may depend upon whether they are able to complement the tourist economy with the higher paying and higher skilled, creative economy.

The Rockies Project went through great pains to replicate Richard Florida's metrics for measuring creativity for each county and major towns/cities in the Rockies in this year's Report Card.

Findings show that communities that seem to be attracting Florida's creative class do in fact have higher rates of innovation, job formation, and earned income than other areas in the Rockies.

Moreover, creative people not only seem to be attracted to areas that have high arts and cultural amenities, but there seems to be strong associations between creativity and areas that have high natural amenities in the forms of protected public lands, topographic variation, and intact natural habitats.

The results reveal the top communities in the Rockies that seem to be capitalizing on the benefits of the so-called "New West" economy.

Responsible Self-Governance for Politics of Place

More so than simple geographic overlays and shared landscapes, our interactions in civic life mark our most challenging and defining connections as citizens of the Rockies. But are these interactions dissipating? Or more generally, do cowboys increasingly bowl alone?

Ever since Robert Putnam published his account of the decline in American social capital in "Bowling Alone" in 2000, there has been no image more powerful in American civic life than that of silent citizens, standing in lanes once jammed with bowling leagues, bowling alone.

Putnam moves beyond his seeming inconsequential statistic of declining participation in bowling leagues, to analyze declines in social networks, public and private institutions, and political participation that are critical to community vibrancy.

Set amidst the backdrop of a region that largely accepts Frederick Jackson Turner's belief in the resilient individualism of the rugged frontier, the application of Robert Putnam's social capital theory from his book "Bowling Alone" to the Rocky Mountain West seems preposterous.


Results show that areas that place a premium on education attainment, that emphasize good communication between civic leaders and local citizens, and areas that facilitate public participation through fostering an invested interest in place, seem to be have the highest levels of social capital and the most civically engaged populations.

However, the work of revisionist historians like Terry Anderson who authors an essay in this year's Report Card, shows that cooperation - not individualism - "tamed" the West.

As Matthew Lee-Ashley notes in this year's Report Card, "Where social capital, and thus cooperation was abundant, settlers had a better chance of planting and raising a healthy crop, immigrants had a better chance of locating work, Native Americans had a better chance of adjusting to the waves of newcomers, and cowboys and cowgirls had a better chance of finding a market for their cattle."

Indeed, engagement in society has been, and will continue to be, essential to the Western experience and health of our communities.

The 2005 Report Card set out to measure and grade all 280 counties in the Rockies on both their social capital – the bonds that enable collective action, and their civic engagement – the participation of citizens in public life.

Results show that areas that place a premium on education attainment, that emphasize good communication between civic leaders and local citizens, and areas that facilitate public participation through fostering an invested interest in place, seem to be have the highest levels of social capital and the most civically engaged populations.

Top communities in the Rockies are revealed that seem to be on track towards achieving more responsible governance.

The challenges of creating community in the Rockies, of fostering an economy, culture, and politics of place, are uniquely heightened given the rapidly transforming economic and demographic characteristics of the region.

Redefining the boundaries of adversarial politics and charting a collective future as a region will be essential to not only grappling with these changes, but also preserving our quality of life for generations to come.

The 2005 State of the Rockies Report Card builds upon Colorado College's tradition of identifying, assessing, and communicating the Rocky Mountain region's key demographic, economic, and land-use challenges.

Topics such as toxic pollution, energy development, urban sprawl, and national parks under stress (in addition to sections on creative occupations and civic engagement that are briefly explored here) highlight this year's discussion of pertinent trends in the eight-state Rocky Mountain West.

Visit www.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies to find out how your community fared.

Patrick Holmes is Program Coordinator for the Colorado College State of the Rockies Project, Colorado Springs, Colo.

 

Analysis:
Data paint polluted picture of West

By Shellie Nelson, assistant editor
Headwaters News
May 11, 2005

This year's Colorado College's Annual Report Card on the Rockies shows another side of the Rocky Mountain states that isn't all soaring mountain vistas gleaming in the clear air, with pristine water running through the rich, undisturbed soil.

In fact, the first segment of the report released online is entitled "Toxic Rockies," and takes the reader through the Superfund sites, the former nuclear weapon testing sites, the current nuclear waste storage sites and myriad other sources of pollution located in the eight Rocky Mountain States.

The report relies upon data released by the Environmental Protection Agency in its Toxic Inventory Report and comes up with some interesting figures.

The report examines data on pollutants in the air, water and land of the Rocky Mountain states and what industries are the sources of those emissions.

Nevada led the Rocky Mountain states in total toxic chemicals released in 2002, and 98 percent of those emissions came from metals mining; Arizona was second in total releases, and Utah third. New Mexico ranked lowest in total emissions.

Nearly 63 percent of the total toxic releases in the Rocky Mountain states comes from metal mining, and only 3 percent come from electric utilities.

There are 86 Superfund sites scattered around the Rocky Mountain states.

In 2004, 10 percent of the 280 counties in the Rocky Mountain states failed to meet federal air-quality standards, and in 72 of those counties 10 percent of the water is threatened or impaired.

Most of the counties where water supplies are threatened or impaired are in Montana, and most of those Montana counties show more than 12 percent of their water is threatened.

The report broke down toxic air emissions into pounds per square mile and listed the 10 metro and non-metro counties where the highest level of emissions were found. Tooele County, Utah led the urban counties and Minidoka, Idaho, led the rural counties.

Several counties garnered top 10 spots on both the toxic air and toxic water emissions levels: Nez Perce, Idaho, ranked first for toxic water and third for toxic air emissions; Canyon County, Idaho, ranked second and ninth, respectively.

The Rocky Mountain West leads the nation in toxic chemical releases from land; in 2002, toxic chemical releases from land sources were twice as high in the West as in the nation as a whole.

Nevada and Utah led the states for the most toxic land releases, with Salt Lake County ranked first in urban counties and Humbolt County, Nevada, ranked first in non-metropolitan counties.

In the final rankings, paper, pulp and lumber mills in Idaho's Nez Perce County pumped the county to the top ranking of urban counties for total emissions. Sugar beet and other food processing plants pushed Idaho's Minidoka County to the top of non-urban counties for pollution.

The Environmental Protection Agency did not consider agricultural sources of pollution in its toxic chemical index.

So Colorado College used U.S. Department of Agriculture data to look at pesticide and fertilizer use. Not surprisingly, almost all of the counties that ranked highest for those chemicals are in Idaho and Colorado.

The Colorado College, using the Environmental Defense Fund's scorecard, also ranked health risks for residents of the Rocky Mountain west for both cancer and non-cancer illnesses.

The good news is that ozone depletion is 10 times greater in the United States than in the Rocky Mountain West. The bad news is the cancer health risk is 1.5 times greater in the Rockies than in the nation as a whole.

Nevada led the Rockies for in both categories of health risks; New Mexico has the lowest ranking for non-cancer health risks; and Colorado was the lowest for cancer health risks.

The data relied upon for the Toxic Rockies report is based on toxic emissions in 2002, the last year for which data has been compiled.

Since 2002, oil and gas exploration has exploded in the Rocky Mountain West and coalbed methane development has taken off in Montana and Wyoming.

Copper mining is experiencing a resurgence in Arizona, and gold and silver mines are reopening in Idaho and Montana.

Coal-fired generation plants are being built, too.

One wonders what the 2007 Report Card on the Rockies will have to say about toxic pollutants and the state of health in the Rocky Mountain West after the numbers from 2003 and 2004 are crunched.

Headwaters News is a project of the
Center for the Rocky Mountain West
at the University of Montana.
 
Send this page to a
friend or colleague

The 2005 State of the Rockies Report Card is now available!
Click here to get a copy.

A PDF verion of The "Toxic Rockies" section has is available online. View it here.

A PDF verion of The "Civic Engagement and Capacity" section has is available online. View it here.

A PDF verion of The "National Parks Under Stress" section has is available online. View it here.

A PDF verion of The "Rockies Sprawl Index" section has is available online. View it here.

A PDF verion of The "Creative Occupations Patterns" section has is available online. View it here.

 

Author's blog:
West must be proactive on energy

Are the Rockies a huge welcome mat for visitors, or does the rest of the nation wipe its proverbial feet here?

Vast energy resources denote the region: the bulk of the nation’s coal is produced here; 40 percent of the nation’s natural gas reserves are said to exist here; Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico has called the American Southwest the "Saudi Arabia of renewable energy potential," and recently rising prices of oil have also turned eyes West.

It is no wonder that many energy analysts see the Rocky Mountain West as a keystone of our national energy strategy.

Yet while outsiders generally see only wealth when exploring our energy resources, communities from within the region face difficult tradeoffs in balancing lucrative job opportunities and economic growth, with potential waste, pollution and dissipated natural amenities.

The 2005 State of the Rockies Report Cards examines the communities within the Rockies who are in line to bear the benefits and brunt of the impacts from distant decisions over how to manage the region’s energy resources.

The section “Rockies Energy Futures” explores these trends through profiling energy production, generation, consumption and reserves throughout the Rockies.

Precipitous rises in natural gas prices have energy developers turning back to coal to produce electricity here in the Rocky Mountains, with more than 40 proposals on the table for new or expanded coal-fired power plants in the region.

Rather than contesting these proposals, some communities are seeking proactive contractual solutions that capture many of the benefits of the plans, while mitigating some of the costs.

Like in many other parts of this year’s Report Card, it is the communities who are the most innovative and engaged that seem to be overcoming the region’s most pressing challenges.

In Colorado, where Xcel Energy was moving forward with plans to expand its coal operations in Pueblo with a 750-megawatt generating unit, an unprecedented number of concerned citizens and community groups engaged in the planning process with the company to ensure that environmental compliance, energy efficiency, and renewable energy futures were all included in the company’s final plan.

Under the plan, Xcel gets to go ahead with constructing the new $1.35 billion coal plant as part of its least cost resource plan to add 3,600 megawatts of capacity to meet future Front Range demands without further opposition from the concerned parties. Xcel also gets to raise rates to protect its credit ratings.

Consumers capped construction costs and ensured they will not have to pay for the plant until it is up and running.

They also convinced Xcel to invest $196 million to cut peak demand through subsidizing energy-saving appliances and other energy-efficiency programs.

Environmentalists persuaded Xcel to consider global warming costs, install pollution prevention equipment at new and existing facilities in Pueblo and develop 890 megawatts of renewable energy by 2013.

In a state where input materials like coal and natural gas are relatively abundant and thus cheap, and where the energy industry is relatively uncompetitive, incentives for energy efficiency and renewable production were lacking.

The plan etched out by Pueblo citizens and Xcel industry officials provides an excellent example of engaged citizens finding innovative ways to chart a better future while working with, rather than against, industry.

Similar opportunities abound in the Rockies with regard to energy.

How might we begin to work with natural gas producers to find innovative ways to cover the marginal costs of things like directional drilling and noise abatement to better preserve our landscapes and wildlife?

How might renewable energy investments support the economic base of our struggling rural farm and ranching communities?

Engaged citizens must explore these and other opportunities in order to benefit from outside energy plans that will inevitably involve our contested backyards, while most importantly, still minimizing any associated negative impacts.


join the discussion