Headwaters Home
subscribe
Page 1
contact us
search
Headwaters Perspective Headwaters News engages our readers in a different issue every other week.

We encourage you to send us your comments. Your email must contain your name.
   
 
Send this page
to a friend or colleague

Read past Perspectives

Read the Interior Secretaries series


Related stories:
     


Democrats mull changes in 2008 primary calendar
Washington Post; 12/09/2005

Colorado panel member predicts Western state will be picked
Denver Post; 12/11/2005

Democrats mull changes in 2008 primary calendar
Washington Post; 12/09/2005

Western Democrats push for regional primary
Arizona Republic; 12/04/2005

Caucus plan could boost Nevada's clout
Reno Gazette-Journal; 11/27/05

Idaho governor considers joining push for regional primary
Idaho Falls Post Register; 10/13/2005

Utah, N.M. governors pitch regional primary in 2008
Santa Fe New Mexican; 10/12/2005

Wyoming governor ambivalent about Western primary
Casper Star-Tribune; 09/01/2005

Editorials:

Primarily Wrong
Los Angeles Times; 12/09/2005

Western primary becoming less a pipe dream, more a reality
New West; 12/05/2005


Backgrounders

The Fate of The New Hampshire Primary
Listen to "The Exchange" on New Hampshire Public Radio, 12/12/2005

Commission on the Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling
The Democratic Party, 12/12/2005

Democrats for the West

Resolution on Western States Presidential Primary/Caucus
Western Governors Association, June 2004


     
Western Perspective is sponsored by:

Hewlett

CRMW logo
Western Perspective Analysis
Trend gives Western flavor to national politics
By Daniel Berger,
assistant editor
Headwaters News
Dec. 15, 2005

Just like Washington, D.C, has its "Beltway" — a perspective from which those inside tend to view the world — the Rockies have a similar feature, which you could call the "Rockyway." It might stretch from the plains east of the Rocky Mountains to the Washington, Oregon and California state lines.

One of the biggest buzz issues inside the Rockyway right now is the idea of a Western primary, where up to eight states would hold presidential primaries or caucuses on the same day early in 2008, currently planned for February 5th. The idea isn't necessarily a new one, but is enjoying a revival, mainly because of a growing contingency of active elected officials and party leaders.

New Mexico Democratic Gov. Bill Richardson and Utah's Republican Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. are both behind the idea and are planning to coordinate simultaneous state presidential primaries and caucuses in early 2008. Republican Idaho Gov. Dirk Kempthorne has expressed some interest, as has Democratic Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano. Democratic leaders from Colorado and Republican Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn have also said they are interested.

The idea gained traction at the recent Democratic National Committee meeting in Phoenix. There, Democrats for the West encouraged the national party to adopt the idea. Organization leaders circulated a petition (also available online through Dec. 15) seeking support for an idea. The primary is also supported by the Western Governors' Association.

From inside the Rockyway, the idea makes a lot of sense. As the region grows in population and diversity, it seeks to graduate from its "flyover" status into a region with real clout in the country. Its issues are national — most notably immigration, energy development and urban growth — and its leaders are commanding more attention across the country. Many Democratic governors, such as Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer, have become examples for the rest of the party seeking to emulate the populist leader model. And though he hasn't publicly admitted it, yet, New Mexico's Richardson is acting like a contender for the Democratic presidential ticket in 2008.

So how does the idea look from outside the Rockyway? Except for interest from Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, who may decide to run for president, it hasn't fully caught on yet. (Romney is a leader in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and would surely benefit from a primary in LDS-strongholds Utah, Idaho and Arizona.)

Romney's announcement on Dec. 14 that he would not run for re-election, has fueled speculation that the conservative from a "blue" state would make a presidential bid.

There is another force at work here though, which could benefit the idea. The Republicans haven't chimed in much yet, but the Democrats are making noise that the primary structure needs tweaking. The two early events, a primary in New Hampshire and a caucus in Iowa, focus too much attention on two states that don't represent that party's growing diversity in population and issues.

Leaders of that party want to broaden the primary season and geography so that more issues and different people are represented earlier on. Most absent, they say, are Westerners, Southerners and Hispanics.

During the past election, more states held their primaries earlier, but that just seemed to clutter the season and didn't make much difference. Instead, adding a few key states either between the New Hampshire and Iowa events or right after, might force the diversity of people and issues to bubble up to the surface more.

The key for proponents of a Western Primary is that one or more Western states have a shot at these influential slots. After last week's meeting, it seems Nevada stands the best chance, but Arizona and Colorado might also be considered.

The big appeal for Nevada is its booming population, including its Hispanic population. The state also hasn't formally joined the push for a collective regional primary on the same day, making it more independent from the idea. (Colorado hasn't joined that cause, either.)

Perhaps the Democrat's biggest ally is Colorado's Michael Stratton, a member of a Democratic Party commission charged with reviewing and making recommendations on changes to the primary structure. Stratton was at the DNC meeting in Phoenix promoting a Western Primary and handing out the petition.

He's also quoted on the Democrats for the West Web site as saying, "The future of the Democratic Party lies out West, because it's home to some of the fastest growing areas in the country. The Democratic Party needs to put western issues and western values out-front. That means talking about the things that are important to communities in the Rocky Mountain region — energy, water rights, natural resources…"

It also means bringing those issues from inside the Rockyway to inside the Beltway, which is something most Westerners would support — or would they?

Tell us what you think.

 
Headwaters News is a project of the
Center for the Rocky Mountain West
at the University of Montana.
 


Daniel Kemmis
writes
a bi-monthly column for Headwaters News that focuses issues common to the Rocky Mountain States.


Daniel Kemmis is a Senior Fellow at the Center for the Rocky Mountain West at The University of Montana.

He is the former Mayor of Missoula, Montana, and a former Speaker and Minority Leader of the Montana House of Representatives.

Mr. Kemmis is the author of three books: Community and The Politics of Place; The Good City and the Good Life; and This Sovereign Land: A New Vision for Governing the West.

In 1998, the Center of the American West awarded him the Wallace Stegner Prize for sustained contribution to the cultural identity of the West.

In 2002, This Sovereign Land was the top choice for the Interior Department's Executive Forum Speaker Series.

comment on this column