Rancher changes tune about wolves in real estate ad
By Todd Wilkinson
regional columnist and author
I don't have a license to sell real
estate, and I doubt I'll receive a penny of commission if anyone, upon reading
this advertisement, decides to part with $1.1 million to buy the Next Right
Thing Ranch.
Situated in Montana's Paradise Valley, some 25 miles north of Yellowstone National
Park, the Next Right Thing recently came on the market and what follows, verbatim,
is the owner-seller's description of his property:
"At the Next Right Thing Ranch, wildlife are your closest neighbors. Moose,
big horn sheep, grizzly bears, wolves, mule and white-tailed deer all share
the neighborhood, as do a wide variety of smaller species, such as beaver and
coyotes. One of the most visible wildlife species is elk that winter on the
adjacent Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation's Winter Range. Herds numbering in the
thousands are not uncommon."
Yes, the place sounds an awful lot like Nirvana (and it is), if you're the kind
of person who appreciates having true wildness out the back door and all of
the various elements that come with it. The seller goes on to explain that the
Paradise Valley "should have been a national park on the scale of Yellowstone";
that's how ecologically rich it is.
In the name of full disclosure, I should note the Next Right Thing Ranch isn't
owned by just anyone in this breathtaking dell chock-full of movie stars, corporate
CEOs and other bigwigs who merely want a place where they can relax anonymously
and not be hounded.
This 41-acre tract is owned by Robert T. Fanning, Jr., one of the most vocal
anti-wolf crusaders in the American West, who has gone before western state
legislators, members of Congress, Wise Use groups, and TV cameras tirelessly
informing the public how wolves have decimated the landscape near his ranch
and transformed Yellowstone into "a biological desert."
In fact, you read right here how Mr. Fanning, a few years ago, declared that
by 2004, the "largest migrating elk herd on Earth (Yellowstone's northern
elk herd, which inhabits land around Mr. Fanning's property) will be completely
extinct."
Mr. Fanning added that: "We predict entire communities in Montana will
vanish because no one spoke up for social justice for the people who were forced
to live with wolves."
More recently, he claimed the nearby Absaroka-Beartooth mountains, which he
called "continental America's most productive public hunting grounds and
Montana's most popular hunting grounds" are "now destroyed by wolf
predation."
Being a lowly journalist, I admit that I don't know much about the real estate
business, but I do know that, by law, the sellers of private property and their
agents have to tell the truth when they are listing a piece of land.
A guy can get sued for lying or deliberately misleading prospective buyers if
the property is not what it is claimed to be.
Mr. Fanning's real estate representatives have him quoted as saying, "Anyone
who buys this ranch won't be disappointed. It is a one-of-a-kind, end-of-the
road ranch, providing one of the last chances to live in Paradise Valley –
a place that is indeed paradise for anyone who loves wild things and wild places."
I was thinking that maybe Mr. Fanning could clear up what appears to be a significant
contradiction.
In the past, Bob Fanning and other sportsmen in the anti-wolf movement have
promoted a vision of wolves turning the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem into a
wasteland devoid of big game, especially elk.
But in his real estate ad — read it at www.nextrightthingranch.com —
he creates a visual scene of a landscape teeming with wildlife. ... "One
of the most visible wildlife species is elk that winter on the adjacent winter
range."
Mr. Fanning says "Herds numbering in the thousands are not uncommon."
Once and for all, Bob, set the record straight: Are the public lands around
your $1.1 million ranch a wildlife shangri-la or a wasteland; are there good
numbers of elk or are there not?
Tell us, in the name of full legal disclosure: Is having wolves and abundant
wildlife an asset or a liability to the value of your land? You're not under
oath, but someday you could be.