It
is a sign of the times that a recent meeting in a one-room
schoolhouse in a remote valley
in the Blue Mountains of eastern
Arizona featured a PowerPoint
presentation.
Less emblematic, but more important, perhaps, was who did the presenting: members
of the local grazing community. This fact didn't go unnoticed by the new
forest supervisor of the Apache-Sitgreaves, who was visibly impressed not only
by the presence of the technology in so remote a location, but also by the show
itself.
She wasn't the only one impressed that day. As the show unfolded, detailing
the group's ambitious goals and plans, it became clear that the eight families
of the 220,000-acre upper Eagle Creek watershed have embarked on an unusual strategy
to maintain livestock production on public and private lands in the area.
Their strategy? Stop fighting the future. Meet challenges with creativity. Turn
adversity into opportunity. Learn, adapt and grow.
"The challenges
of drought,
– Chase Caldwell,
Eagle Creek rancher
Their method? They've incorporated as a 501c3 nonprofit
organization, called the Upper Eagle Creek Watershed Association.
Until then, they had been disorganized and reactionary to events they thought
were beyond their control, especially on the national forest land that comprises
a large part of their watershed. They felt helpless as the winds of change
began to blow.
Instead of getting angry, however, or giving up, the families chose to organize,
organize, organize. And that's exactly what they have done, as their flow
chart in their presentation demonstrated. But it wasn't easy getting started.
"We decided early that the board would be composed of landowners or people
who
live in the watershed," said rancher Twig Winkle. "But that caused
a few rocky meetings in the beginning, as people got used to the idea of giving
up their independence."
Sandwiched between the San Carlos Apache Reservation on one side, and Forest
Service land on the other, the residents of remote Eagle Creek knew they didn't
have many options.
"We knew we weren't going to make it by ourselves," said Winkle. "Forming
a nonprofit association gave us a chance."
A future
There was another reason to get together. "We didn't know our neighbors
anymore," said association Secretary Darcy Ely, a resident and third-generation
rancher. "There were some new people we didn't know, and even the
old ones were kind of bunkered down. Some of us thought this wasn't healthy."
Fences in the valley were down or in need of repair. Homes were dark. The schoolhouse,
which had 15 students as recently as 1990, had shut down four years earlier.
Livestock had been removed from all of the ranches with public land but two.
Paychecks were scarce.
"A once-thriving ranch economy was gone," says Chase Caldwell, a
permittee
on the forest and association president. "The challenges of drought,
ever-increasing regulatory requirements, and the introduction of the Mexican
gray
wolf had just about ended livestock grazing. It seemed that we had reached
the end of an era."
In April 2003, with the encouragement of Frank Hayes, the Clifton District
Ranger, residents traveled to a Quivira Coalition conference in Tucson, where
the idea
of forming a nonprofit took hold.
"As I looked around the room," recalled Caldwell, "I recognized,
maybe for the first time, that we had a huge resource of talent and experience
gathered to work on our problem. Literally hundreds of years of experience
in all types of business were there.
"This recognition of talent was an important
revelation for all of us. These were friends and neighbors that I had known,
but not really 'known.' It
gave me a huge lift."
Back home, banking on this experience, and knowing that nonprofits have
access to government and foundation money that would otherwise be unavailable,
they
filed their hopes with the IRS.
They decided on a simple mission statement: The association is "an organization
that benefits the people and the land."
They crafted four purposes for the organization:
• To work together as a community to
preserve our heritage and traditions in Upper
Eagle Creek.
• To work together to improve and preserve our watershed and other valuable
resources.
• To work together to protect, enhance and increase habitat for wildlife
as well
as domestic animals, especially in times of drought.
• To work together to find a sustainable method of economic survival for
the community.
"It was an out-of-the-box
approach to a variety of concerns on the district," said
Frank Hayes. "It was a response to
a challenge I made to them to come
up
with a solution that avoided confrontation. I told them the Forest Service
wanted to be a partner in the community, and now we are."
The unity and diversity of talents in the community were the keys, he said.
"It is doubtful that any one ranching operation can survive economically
or socially by itself anymore," said Hayes. "Together, they can make
a difference among themselves and as a group."
The Tule
The experience of Twig and Shirley Winkle, ranchers and association board
members, encapsulates both the challenges and the opportunities found in
the watershed.
In the mid-1990s, they gave up the city life and purchased the historic Tule
Springs Ranch, 14,000 acres of rough country that had its own story to tell.
In the mid-1970s,
the longtime owner of the Tule (Too-lee) became embroiled in a struggle
with the federal government. Concerned about the effects of poor livestock
management
on public land, the Forest Service cut the ranch's permit from 300 head
of cattle to 190.
It was an almost unprecedented action for the time,
and the rancher resisted mightily, taking the fight all the way to Washington,
D.C.
The rancher lost. Eventually the permit was cut to 90 head. By the time Twig
and Shirley bought the deeded property, including the historic homestead,
the number of cattle allowed to run on the forest had been reduced to 14.
"It wasn't economical, to say the least," said Twig. "And
the place was a mess too. But we were optimistic, or foolish, enough to give
it a
go."
Fortunately, Twig likes to fix things. His 20 years' experience as a heavy
machinery mechanic in Mesa, Ariz., (where he met Shirley in Sunday school
during the eighth grade), had created a set of problem-solving skills that
he would
need to make the Tule work.
In the meantime they need an income. They planted two gardens and began selling
vegetables to folks in Safford. Shirley began raising purebred Airdales for
sale via the Internet.
"Shirley makes more off her dogs than I do off my cows," said Twig
with
a smile.
They also remodeled one of the old buildings into a guest house for outfitters,
vacationers and other folks interested in a remote ranch experience. But
the process of trying to open a dude ranch for business has been sobering.
"We got clobbered by the insurance," said Shirley, "especially
on
the horses. It came out of the blue and kind of depressed us."
In the meantime, Twig began to earn an unusual type of paycheck for a rancher:
by monitoring the land. Knowing the Forest Service was short-handed, and
that his neighbors would need data in support of continued livestock production
on public land, Twig went to school and became proficient at grasses, transects,
photography and reading the signs of erosion.
"The great thing about monitoring is that you learn about limitations," said
Twig. "You get a real good sense of exactly how far you can go, and no
further."
His education took them all over the Southwest, from riparian monitoring
training near Silver City, N.M., to a low-stress livestock handling
clinic at
Ghost Ranch, near Santa Fe. They absorbed new knowledge like sponges.
In fact, when they began to apply the principles of progressive ranch management
to the Tule, in combination with the data from their own monitoring, the
Forest Service responded with a proposal to raise their permitted number
to 55
head – a
proposal that pleased the Winkles, even if it didn't solve their financial
situation.
"Even with the increase, the ranch is still not economical from a cattle
standpoint," said
Winkle, "but that's ok because what's important is I'm
getting paid for good stewardship."
To that end, Twig and Shirley are taking the lead on the idea of a communal
herd of cattle in the Eagle Creek watershed. Combining herds into one, they
believe, is the key to the future.
"Ranchers always say that if they take care of the land, it will take
care of
them," said Twig. "And they're right. But today you've
got to monitor to demonstrate it. And the cattle side of things has also
got to be profitable. I know we can do both."
Making it work
To date, the association has participated in the acquisition of three grants:
one for $40,000 from the Arizona Heritage Fund, through the Arizona Game
and
Fish
Department; one from a group of wildlife associations for $50,000; and one
through members
Jan and Will Holder from the Sonoran Institute for $7,500.
The first two grants were developed in cooperation with the Forest Service
to maintain and develop trail systems in the forest and to continue an ongoing
ecosystem
restoration project through prescribed burning and mechanical thinning of
trees.
The third one, from the Sonoran Institute, is a planning grant. It has six
objectives:
- Create a community herding/grass
banking program.
- Develop a plan to address
problems created by decades of fire suppression.
- Develop a watershed-wide
monitoring program.
- Conduct research to develop ecologically
compatible alternatives to cattle ranching.
- Continue to share information and
education of rangeland and forest issues.
- Continue to develop an organizational
structure that will enhance communications between
the San Carlos Apache Grazing Association and
the US Forest Service.
Not to mention the fundraising, education
and outreach programs the association has planned.
"We are targeting projects that help us reform the economic base of the
Eagle
Creek community," said Caldwell. "Projects like riparian surveys
and protection, stream classification and monitoring, upland vegetation
monitoring, landscape modification through thinning and burning, and
water development.
"
We are making progress on all these projects and all would be extremely
difficult to accomplish as an individual rancher."
Another presenter that day in the schoolhouse was Kent Ellett, a range
conservationist for the Forest Service. He detailed an ambitious restoration
program on forest
land keyed to the reintroduction of prescribed fire.
That he had the
support of his boss, as well as members of the local community, for this
work was
itself another sign of the times.
But it would be wrong to say that everything is rosy on Eagle Creek.
The challenges are daunting, including the occasional "people problem"
typical
of
any organization.
"It's easier to fix the land sometimes than it is to hold the human
equation
together," said Twig Winkle. "But we've done all right so far."
Another challenge will be the time it will take to see on-the-ground
results. But members of association are patient people. In the meantime,
Frank Hayes has
detected a favorable reaction from the Forest Service.
"The association has already had a positive influence on how we, the
agency, does
business," he said. "It is being viewed as a potentially important
entity that might result in a significant change in how livestock grazing
is managed at a landscape scale to adjust and to address watershed-based
issues.
I'm hopeful."
So is Chase Caldwell. "We can see momentum building and we have hope
for our future as a community and the future of ranching," he said.
"It's a testament to what a determined group of people can accomplish."
|